Draya Michele rushed to court days after sheriffs came to her LA home and tried to lock her out as she continues to fight her ex Tyrod Taylor about the property, In contact can report exclusively.

According to court documents obtained by In contactDraya, 39, revealed that officers came to her home in Chatsworth, California, on November 20, about a week before Thanksgiving.

Draya said she received an “alarming call from her children’s nanny while she was on a business trip that the sheriffs were at the property in question to lock the residents out of the property in question.”

Draya said she quickly called her attorney, who drove to the house to flag down sheriffs and prevent the lockout.

The model said that’s when she learned that Tyrod’s company had filed an eviction lawsuit against her, which she didn’t know about. She said a default judgment was entered in the case.

Draya said she was never served with the paperwork, nor did Tyrod, 35, or his legal team inform her about the case, despite actively pursuing each other in a case brought by Draya.

Tyrod allegedly received permission from the court in the mail to serve Draya, indicating he did not violate any law. Draya claims she did not receive any documents in the mail

As In contact As first reported, Draya filed a lawsuit earlier this year asking a judge to force the NFL star to honor an agreement to sell her a home he purchased.

Draya claimed Tyrod bought the house in August 2022 when they were together. She said he bought the property for her and her children. She said the deal was that she would pay him monthly rent.

Additionally, she said he agreed to let her buy the house from him between November 2023 and November 2025.

The model said she offered to buy the home in October 2023 for $2.8 million. Draya claimed Tyrod countered with $3.2 million. Draya said she accepted that offer. She continued to pay $19,000 a month in rent and spent $270,000 on home improvements. Draya said that despite her approval, Tyrod backed out of the deal and refused to sell her the house.

Tyrod denied all allegations of wrongdoing. His lawyer said Draya provided an “unsigned rental agreement, an unsigned purchase agreement and emails that at most show negotiations regarding the possible purchase of the property in question.”

Tyrod and his company argued that a final agreement was never reached and therefore there was no agreement to be enforced.

At a recent hearing, Draya suffered a setback in the case. The court ruled that the counteroffer expired at the time Draya accepted it. Therefore, the judge declared that the contract was unenforceable.

However, the judge said Draya could sue Tyrod for the $270,000 she spent on home improvements.

The court also allowed Draya to amend her complaint to attempt to revive the claims dismissed by the court and allowed her to pursue some other legal theories related to the case that she had originally asserted.

Days later, Draya filed an amended complaint. Tyrod and his company have not yet responded to the amended complaint. Although the case is ongoing, Draya claims the sheriffs showed up last week.

She is asking the court to consolidate the eviction case and her lawsuit. Tyrod hasn’t responded yet.