The definition of corporate insiders can be subjective and varies by jurisdiction. Our data reflects individual insiders and captures at least board members. Senior management runs the company, but the CEO is accountable to the board, even if he or she is a member of the board.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals that leadership thinks like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give tremendous power to a small group within the company. This can be negative under certain circumstances.

We can report that insiders own shares in Charles Schwab Corporation. The insiders have a significant stake worth US$2.0 billion. We are sometimes interested in whether they bought or sold.

The general public – including retail investors – owns 12% of the company’s shares and therefore cannot simply be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a political decision in their favor, they can still have a collective influence on company policy.

It appears that private companies own 4.3% of Charles Schwab shares. Private companies can be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through an ownership interest in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. Although it is difficult to draw general conclusions about stroke, it is worth mentioning as an area for further research.

We can see that public companies hold 10% of Charles Schwab shares outstanding. We can’t be sure, but it’s entirely possible that this is a strategic holding. The companies may be similar or work together.

While it’s certainly worth considering the different ownership groups in a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, consider risks. Every company has them, and we discovered them 1 warning sign for Charles Schwab you should know that.

If you’re like me, you might want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check out this free report showing analyst forecasts for the future.

Note: The figures in this article are calculated using the last twelve months of data, which refers to the twelve-month period ending on the last day of the month in which the financial statements are dated. This may not be consistent with the full year annual report figures.

Do you have feedback on this article? Worried about the content? Get in touch directly with us. Alternatively, you can also send an email to editor-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article from Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts using only an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended as financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock and does not take into account your objectives or financial situation. Our goal is to provide you with long-term focused analysis based on fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not reflect the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no positions in any stocks mentioned.